What statement-level correction looks like in practice.
Detailed outcomes from Verisave partner materials. In each case, the processor relationship remained unchanged; the correction was in payment data flow, transaction classification, account setup, or network-program recovery.
Gateway-to-processor data flow correction
The ERP held the right data. The gateway was not passing it in the format the network required. Once the gateway-to-processor handoff was corrected, transactions began qualifying at the appropriate interchange tier.
What Verisave found and corrected
- Overcharging caused by multiple errors in data flow.
- Critical information was not passing correctly from gateway and POS to processor.
- Gateway administrators corrected the flow and accuracy of payment data.
- Additional account setup adjustments were made.
Transaction misclassification correction
The processor was pricing the transactions it received correctly. The issue was that transactions were arriving in the wrong interchange category. Correcting the classification, not changing the processor, produced the savings.
What Verisave found and corrected
- Common transaction types were being misclassified.
- Verisave worked with the processor to identify and correct classification errors.
- The overcharges were related to interchange classification, not processor margin.
Account setup correction and unpublished discount recovery
This engagement combined two corrections: fixing interchange-qualification data flow and recovering a discount the client was entitled to but had never received.
What Verisave found and corrected
- Overcharging caused by improper account setup.
- An unpublished American Express discount had not been applied.
- Micro-adjustments corrected account setup across billing cycles.
- Verisave petitioned American Express directly and secured the discount.
- An additional $1M in American Express savings was recovered.
Client examples named in Verisave materials.
Use the statement to find out what applies to you.
Representative outcomes do not predict your result. They show the type of issue that can be visible only after reviewing the actual processor statement.